SESSION OF 2002
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE
ON SENATE BILL NO. 95
As
Recommended by Senate Committee
on
Judiciary
Brief
SB
95 would enact the Interstate Compact for Adult Offenders
Supervision and repeal the current Uniform Act for Out-of-State
Parole Supervision.
The
purpose of the Compact is the following:
- Provide the framework for promotion of public
safety;
- Protect the rights of victims through the control
and regulation of the interstate movement of offenders in the
community;
- Provide effective tracking, supervision, and
rehabilitation of these offenders by the sending and receiving
states; and
- Equitably distribute the costs, benefits, and
obligations of the compact among the compacting
states.
The
major provisions of the bill include the
following:
- Establish an interstate commission to: develop
procedures for the transfer of offender supervision
responsibilities from one compact state to another; ensure
opportunity for victim notification and input; establish a system
for uniform data collection and access to information; monitor
compliance; and coordinate training and
education.
- Empower the commission to promulgate rules which
will have the force and effect of statutory law and which will be
binding on the member states.
- Require that the compact promulgate rules to
govern member state procedures in the following areas, at a
minimum, as they relate to interstate compact
offenders:
- victim notification and opportunity for victim
input;
- offender registration and
compliance;
- violations and returns;
- transfer procedures and forms;
- transfer eligibility;
- collection of restitution and
fees;
- uniform standards for data collection and
reporting;
- supervision levels to be provided by the
receiving state;
- transition rules; and
- mediation, arbitration, and dispute
resolution.
- Authorize the commission to enforce compliance
with compact provisions, commission rules and by-laws, using all
necessary and proper means, including but not limited to,
initiation of legal action through the federal court
system.
- Require courts and executive agencies in each
compacting state to enforce the compact and to take all necessary
and appropriate actions to effectuate the compact’s purposes
and intent.
- Authorize the commission to impose penalties on
states determined by the commission to have defaulted in the
performance of any of their compact obligations or
responsibilities. Penalties may include: fees, fines, and costs;
remedial training and technical assistance; and suspension and
termination of membership.
- Provide that all compacting states’ laws
conflicting with the compact are superceded to the extent of the
conflict.
- Authorize the commission to levy and collect an
annual assessment from each member state to finance its operations
and activities.
- Provide that each member state shall create a
State Council for Interstate Adult Offender Supervision, which
shall be responsible for appointment of the commissioner to
represent the state on the compact commission. The state council
would also be responsible for oversight and advocacy concerning the
state’s participation in the compact.
- Provide that the state compact
administrator be appointed either by the governor or the state
council.
- The compact would be effective July 1, 2001, or
upon enactment by the 35th state, whichever is
later.
Background
The Secretary of the Kansas Department of
Corrections supported the bill.
Enactment
of SB 95 would constitute state approval of the Interstate Compact
for Adult Offender Supervision. If approved by 35 states (25 states
have approved the compact to date), the compact would supercede the
Probation and Parole Compact Administration Association, of which
Kansas is currently a member and active
participant.
The
Interstate Compact Unit currently monitors approximately 593
probationers supervised in other states. Additionally, there are
1,018 parole and postrelease offenders under the jurisdiction of
the Kansas Department of Corrections who are under supervision in
other states. There are 249 parolees and 717 probationers from
other states residing in Kansas.
The
fiscal note prepared in 2001 did not indicate a fiscal
impact.