SESSION OF 2000
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 489
As Amended by Senate Committee on
Judiciary
Brief (1)
SB 489 establishes the general prohibition against first or
second stage manufacturers of motor vehicles or distributors or
factory representatives from directly or indirectly owning or
operating a new vehicle dealership in Kansas.
Certain exceptions to the above prohibition include:
- An interest in a dealership may be owned for not to exceed
12 months if the person from whom the dealership was
acquired was a new vehicle dealer and the dealership is for
sale for a reasonable price and reasonable terms. The
Director of the Division of Vehicles may grant a one-time
extension for not to exceed 12 months for good cause.
- Temporary dealership ownership is permitted to broaden
diversity of dealer ownership among minorities or those
lacking resources to purchase a dealership if a relationship
exists with a new vehicle dealer who has made a significant
investment, has an ownership interest, and operates the new
vehicle dealership under a plan to acquire full ownership.
- Further, a minority interest may be owned in an entity that
owns and operates a new vehicle dealership of the line-make
vehicles manufactured if, on January 1, 2000, there were not
more than two new vehicle dealers of the line-make in the
state and the nearest unaffiliated new vehicle dealer of the
same line-make is not less than 100 miles distance (Saturn
dealership as an example).
- Dealerships already owned by first or second stage manufacturers, distributors, or factory representatives.
The bill also extends consumer lemon law protections to
vehicles delivered in Kansas but not sold here. The bill is effective
upon publication in the Kansas Register.
Background
SB 489 was supported by the Kansas Automobile Dealers
Association and the National Association of Minority Automobile
Dealers.
The bill was opposed as introduced by the Alliance of
Automobile Manufacturers. A representative of General Motors
also expressed concern about certain provisions of the bill as
introduced.
The Senate Committee Chairman requested the two sides try
and reach compromise amendments. The Senate Committee
amendments are a result of this attempt.
The bill would have no fiscal impact on the state.
1. *Supplemental notes are prepared by the Legislative Research
Department and do not express legislative intent. The supplemental
note and fiscal note for this bill may be accessed on the Internet at
http://www.ink.org/public/legislative/bill_search.html