As Amended by Senate Committee
As Amended by House Committee
Session of 1999
House Concurrent Resolution No. 5017
By Committee on Agriculture
2-2
11 A
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION urging Congress to direct the En-
12 vironmental Protection
Agency to cease implementation of new re-
13 strictions for
aluminum and magnesium phosphide based grain fumi-
14 gants and to ensure
that risk mitigation allowances for such grain
15 fumigants are based on
sound science and reliable information and to
16 initiate
administrative rulemaking that ensures the Food Quality
17 Protection Act
is implemented in a manner that utilizes sound
18 science and real
world data, protects the production, availability
19 and
affordability of food and further urges Congress to
conduct
20 oversight
hearings to ensure EPA actions are consistent with
21 Congressional
intent.
22
23 WHEREAS, The
agricultural heritage and economy of the State of
24 Kansas is dependent upon the harvest,
storage and transportation of grain;
25 and
26 WHEREAS, There
are 785 grain elevators in Kansas and 65,000 farms
27 in Kansas, many of which are family-owned
operations; and
28 WHEREAS, Kansas
grain elevators are valued neighbors to and lo-
29 cated in close proximity to homes, schools,
farms and businesses in most
30 of all Kansas' communities; and
31 WHEREAS, Kansas
grain elevators, feed mills, processors and grow-
32 ers are committed to protecting the health
and safety of applicators and
33 workers and the wellbeing of the public;
and
34 WHEREAS, Grain
elevators are located in Kansas communities near
35 railroads and highways to facilitate the
transportation of grain; and
36 WHEREAS, Kansas
is a leader in the Nation and in the World in grain
37 production; and
38 WHEREAS, Kansas
grain elevators, feed mills, processors and grow-
39 ers are committed to producing an adequate
safe and high quality food
40 supply for domestic and world consumers;
and
41 WHEREAS,
Treaties and established trade relations may require pest-
42 controlled grain before grain can be
exported; and
HCR 5017--Am. by S
2
1 WHEREAS,
Insect pests in grain without fumigation treatment could
2 create health risks and reduce the
quality of the grain marketed from
3 Kansas; and
4 WHEREAS,
Aluminum and magnesium phosphide gas are
cost-effec-
5 tive fumigants used both by
commercial elevators and farmers in the
6 storage of grain in Kansas; and
7 WHEREAS,
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) acknowl-
8 edges few, if any, viable
alternatives to the use of aluminum and mag-
9 nesium phosphide exist for fumigation
to control pests in stored grain;
10 and
11 WHEREAS, The
current label restrictions for aluminum and mag-
12 nesium phosphide gas
provide for the safe and effective use of the prod-
13 uct; and
14 WHEREAS, The
State of Kansas practices rigorous enforcement of
15 the label restrictions on fumigants,
ensures adequate training of certified
16 applicators and conducts a fumigation and
grain storage project to inspect
17 the use of fumigants; and
18 WHEREAS,
Restrictions in the use of fumigants in grain storage and
19 transportation should be based only on
sound scientific reasoning, avail-
20 able technology and accurate analysis of
risk level and avoid raising undue
21 public alarm over unsubstantiated or
inconsequential risk: Now,
22 therefore,
23 Be it resolved by
the House of Representatives of the State of Kansas,
24 the Senate concurring
therein: That the Congress of the United States
25 direct the EPA to curtail implementation of
new restrictions from its
26 reregistration eligibility decision (RED)
on phosphide phosphine gas
27 that would require a 500-foot buffer zone
and other restrictions that ef-
28 fectively preclude the use of aluminum or
magnesium phosphide in most
29 Kansas grain storage facilities and grain
transportation; and
30 Be it further
resolved: That Congress direct the EPA to ensure that
31 risk mitigation allowances for aluminum and
magnesium phosphides are
32 clearly demonstrated as necessary to
protect human health, are based
33 upon sound science and reliable
information, are economically and op-
34 erationally reasonable and will permit the
continued use of these products
35 in accordance with the label; and
36 WHEREAS,
The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA)
37 was signed into law on August 3,
1996; and
38 WHEREAS,
The FQPA institutes changes in the types of infor-
39 mation the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is required to
40 evaluate in the risk assessment
process for establishing tolerances
41 for pesticide residues in food and
feed; and
42 WHEREAS,
The FQPA was to assure that pesticide tolerances
43 and policies are formulated in an
open and transparent manner;
HCR 5017--Am. by S
3
1 and
2
WHEREAS, The FQPA further emphasizes the need for
reliable
3 information about the volume
and types of pesticides being applied
4 to individual crops and what
residues can be anticipated on these
5 crops; and
6
WHEREAS, Risk estimates based on sound science and
reliable
7 real-world data are essential
to avoid misguided decisions, and the
8 best way for the EPA to obtain
this data is to require its develop-
9 ment and submission by the
registrant through the data call-in pro-
10 cess; and
11 WHEREAS,
The implementation of FQPA by the EPA could have
12 a profound negative impact on
domestic agriculture production and
13 on consumer food prices and
availability; and
14 WHEREAS,
The possibility of elimination of these products will
15 result in fewer pest control options
for the United States and Kansas
16 and significant disruption of
successful integrated pest management
17 programs which would be devastating
to the economy of our state
18 and jeopardize the very livelihood of
many of our agricultural pro-
19 ducers; and
20 WHEREAS,
The absence of reliable information will result in
21 fewer pest control options for urban
and suburban uses, with po-
22 tential losses of personal property
and increased costs for human
23 health concerns: Now,
therefore,
24 Be it
resolved by the Senate of the State of Kansas, the House of
Rep-
25 resentatives concurring
therein: That the EPA should be directed
by
26 Congress to immediately initiate
appropriate administrative rule-
27 making to ensure that the policies
and standards it intends to apply
28 in evaluating pesticide tolerances
are subject to thorough public
29 notice and comment prior to final
tolerance determinations being
30 made by the agency; and
31 Be it
further resolved: That the EPA use sound science and
real-
32 world data from the data call-in
process in establishing realistic
33 models for evaluating risks;
and
34 Be it
further resolved: That the United States Department
of Ag-
35 riculture (USDA) establish FQPA as a
priority and that EPA be
36 required to have reliable pesticide
residue data and other FQPA
37 data on the specific crop affected by
any proposed restriction, be-
38 fore, EPA imposes restriction of a
pesticide under FQPA; and
39 Be it
further resolved: That the EPA should be directed by
Con-
40 gress to implement the FQPA in a
manner that will not disrupt ag-
41 ricultural production nor negatively
impact the availability, diver-
42 sity and affordability of food;
and
43 Be it
further resolved: That Congress should immediately
conduct
HCR 5017--Am. by S
4
1 oversight hearings to ensure
that actions by EPA are consistent with
2 FQPA provisions and
Congressional intent; and
3
Be it further resolved: That the Secretary of State be
directed to send
4 enrolled copies of this resolution to
the President of the United States,
5 the administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency, the
6 President of the United States
Senate, the Speaker of the United State
7 States House of
Representatives, the Secretary of the United
States
8 Department of
Agriculture and to each member of the Kansas Con-
9 gressional Delegation.
10