Session of 1998
SENATE RESOLUTION No. 1830
By Committee on Utilities
3-13
9
A RESOLUTION urging the State Corporation
Commission to postpone
10 certain proceedings
and conduct an investigation relating to a natural
11 gas contract (P-0802
contract).
12
13 WHEREAS, The State
Corporation has reviewed and made certain
14 determinations with respect to a natural
gas contract, identified as the P-
15 0802 contract; and
16 WHEREAS, The State
Corporation Commission made certain deter-
17 minations in its order of March 12, 1979,
in Docket No. 113,421-U, where
18 the Commission found that the P-0802
contract was not used and useful
19 for the purpose of providing natural gas
service to retail customers in
20 Kansas; and
21 WHEREAS, The State
Corporation Commission found as follows:
22 ``Furthermore, we are unconvinced that this
contract relationship of ap-
23 plicant with its wholly owned subsidiary
has been maintained strictly at
24 `arms length'. We are particularly
concerned that applicant appears to
25 have sacrificed benefits of considerable
importance by the amendments
26 negotiated subsequent to the original
contract.'' (Order of March 12,
27 1979, at para. 41, page 28); and
28 WHEREAS, Kansas
ratepayers made contributions to develop oil and
29 gas leases in the Bowdoin Field in Montana,
which were ultimately made
30 the subject of the P-0802 contract; and
31 WHEREAS, The P-0802
contract was made the subject of a corporate
32 spin off, wherein utility stockholders were
given one share of stock in the
33 company that retained the P-0802 contract
for each share of utility stock
34 that was owned by the utility share owner;
and
35 WHEREAS, Ratepayers
received no benefits from the spin off; and
36 WHEREAS, The P-0802
contract was renegotiated as the spin off was
37 occurring in a transaction which was not at
arm's length and which did
38 not permit marketing out of the contract if
the price under the contract
39 was incompatible with current market
conditions; and
40 WHEREAS, The price of
the P-0802 contract is well above current
41 market prices; and
42 WHEREAS, Parties to a
State Corporation Commission docket
43 (Docket No. 96-KNNG-700-TAR) entered into a
settlement agreement
SR 1830
2
1 to postpone a determination of the
prudency of the P-0802 contract until
2 after September 30, 1999, in exchange
for rate relief which was to be
3 effective through 1999 but, in
accepting the agreement, the Commission
4 nevertheless determined that there
was evidence to support that the con-
5 tract was prudent, even though the
docket was not established for the
6 purpose of determining the prudency
of the contract, the determination
7 was at odds with earlier rulings by
the Commission concerning the con-
8 tract and the Commission order had
the effect of undermining the set-
9 tlement agreement of the parties in
Docket No. 96-KNNG-700-TAR; and
10 WHEREAS, On December 19,
1996, approximately 200 ratepayers
11 appeared before the State Corporation
Commission to request a pru-
12 dency review of the P-0802 contract;
and
13 WHEREAS, In a subsequent
docket (Docket No. 97-KNNG-523-
14 GIG), the State Corporation Commission
agreed to investigate the as-
15 signment of the contract as part of the gas
realignment that was ordered
16 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
to determine if the as-
17 signment was proper, but the Commission
refused to include the issue
18 of the P-0802 contract's prudency, even
though such a review would
19 impact on the contract's
assignment: Now, therefore,
20 Be it resolved by the
Senate of the State of Kansas: That the State
21 Corporation Commission be urged to postpone
its current proceedings
22 in Docket No. 97-KNNG-523-GIG until such
time that the prudency of
23 all transactions involving the P-0802
contract can be independently de-
24 termined or after September 30, 1999;
and
25 Be it further
resolved: That the State Corporation Commission be
26 urged to conduct an investigation of all
aspects of the P-0802 contract,
27 including the earlier decision of the
Commission which established that
28 the contract was not required for utility
service in Kansas and was not
29 negotiated in an arm's length
transaction.
30